DINAMIKA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LAUT TAKESHIMA ANTARA JEPANG DAN KOREA SELATAN BERDASARKAN TINJAUAN UNCLOS 1982

https://doi.org/10.46601/juridicaugr.v6i2.422

Authors

  • Grace Oktavia Nababan Universitas Bengkulu
  • Zilva Aulia Rahma
  • Beben Inisyaputra
  • Ema Septaria
  • M Ilham Adepio

Keywords:

Arbitration, ITLOS, Dokdo Island, Maritime Dispute, UNCLOS 1982

Abstract

This study examines the maritime dispute between Japan and South Korea over Takeshima Island (Dokdo) using international maritime law, particularly UNCLOS 1982. It explores dispute resolution mechanisms such as conciliation (Article 282), arbitration (Annex VII), and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Article 287, Annex VI). The study uses normative legal research to analyze key UNCLOS principles, including peaceful dispute settlement (Article 279), consultation in good faith (Article 283), equitable maritime delimitation (Articles 74 and 83), and cooperation in managing exclusive economic zones and conserving marine resources (Articles 56 and 61). Japan promotes resolution through legal means, while South Korea maintains de facto control and rejects international adjudication. The dispute concerns both sovereignty and natural resource rights. The study concludes that UNCLOS 1982 provides a solid legal and normative framework for peaceful settlement, but its effectiveness depends on the political will of both countries to uphold international maritime law.

References

A. Buku

-

B. Makalah/Artikel/Prosiding/Hasil Penelitian

Al Dina, M. 2022. Efektivitas Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pulau Takeshima/Dokdo Melalui Jalur Non-Yuridis. Yurispruden : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 5, No. 1.

Gagang, I and Hayoga, H. 2015. Tinjauan Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Dengan Perjanjian Bilateral Dalam Kerangka UNCLOS 1982 (Studi Kasus Pulau Dokdo/Takeshima Antara Korea Selatan dan Jepang). Serambi Hukum 9 Vol 1.

Kim, H and Cho, J. 2011. A New Approach to a Territorial Dispute Involving A Former Colonizer-Colony Pair: The Case of the Dokdo/Takeshima Dispute between Korea and Japan.

Krista, W and Ajin, C. 2017. Nationalism, Public Opinion, and Dispute Resolution. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 27, No. 2.

Novi, S, and Ni Putu, R. 2019. Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepulauan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional (Studi Kasus Sengketa Perebutan Pulau Dokdo Antara Jepang-Korea Selatan). E-Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendididkan Ganesha Jurusan Ilmu Hukum 2, No. 3.

Utami, G. 2022. Penyelesaian Sengketa Sengketa Pulau Dokdo Antara Jepang Dan Korea Selatan Secara Damai. Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 2, No. 2.

United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

C. Internet

-

D. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Pasal 2 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Pasal 56 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Pasal 61 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Pasal 74 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Pasal 83 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Pasal 279 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Pasal 282 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Pasal 283 United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982.

Published

31-05-2025

How to Cite

Nababan, G. O., Rahma, Z. A., Inisyaputra, B., Septaria, E., & Adepio, M. I. (2025). DINAMIKA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LAUT TAKESHIMA ANTARA JEPANG DAN KOREA SELATAN BERDASARKAN TINJAUAN UNCLOS 1982. JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 6(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.46601/juridicaugr.v6i2.422

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.